Monday, November 21, 2005
Pseudo-Academic |
I bet everyone who comes to this blog at one point or the other have been the site of The Lanka Academic.
Even thought LAcnet has been running for quite some time and has gained a reputation as a fairly decent news site, I think there are serious flaws in the way they work.
Recently they started a forum where people are allowed to discuss things. If you go there you will notice the moderators coming down rather hard on people who are critical of the right-wing fundamentalists in Sri Lanka. A majority of the commentors in the forum are very clearly Sinhala chauvinists living abroad, and they have little tolerance for anything even remotely LTTE-friendly or peace-process friendly. Overall there is little space for anyone, Tamil or otherwise, to say anything about the LTTE without calling the terrorists.
When the Sinhala chauvinist commentors trash the others the moderators remain silent and when one of the others decides to retaliate with trash (not more spiteful than that which was aimed at them) the moderators shut them down. Several of my friends who have tried to have intelligent discussions on a TLA forum have quit out of exasperation because the moderators have made it very clear as to their stand on things.
I do not know if this is the policy of TLA. Perhaps the people who are moderating their forum have started to push their individual political agendas without the knowledge of the TLA people, but that is highly unlikely. Even when people have complained to the TLA admin, they have been asked to respect the rules set down by the moderator and shut up.
But increasingly they have also begun to openly express their right wing pro-war stance through reports in news, such as the one I reproduce below.
This article has the potential to be a huge story and TLA knows that. But there is no reporter credited with the story, and the details are very very vague. Special Correspondent in London? My ass. TLA doesn't have paid reporters anywhere. One of their friends probably called them up and told them this story.
I do not deny that this story is probably true. I have heard stories from people in Australia and Canada about the LTTE engaging in similar activities over there after the election. But the reason TLA put this story out is not because it wants to tell the truth, but because it wants to further it's own agenda (or the agenda of those who run it). They've become just another one of those groups who are always looking out for a big stick with which to beat the LTTE.
It's sad that these people call themselves academics, do little but steal news stories from other sources and republish them. They do no reporting of their own, and only publish rumors they have heard when it suits their need or is in keeping with their agenda.
But then, Sri Lankans are used to people like this calling themselves 'academics'.
Even thought LAcnet has been running for quite some time and has gained a reputation as a fairly decent news site, I think there are serious flaws in the way they work.
Recently they started a forum where people are allowed to discuss things. If you go there you will notice the moderators coming down rather hard on people who are critical of the right-wing fundamentalists in Sri Lanka. A majority of the commentors in the forum are very clearly Sinhala chauvinists living abroad, and they have little tolerance for anything even remotely LTTE-friendly or peace-process friendly. Overall there is little space for anyone, Tamil or otherwise, to say anything about the LTTE without calling the terrorists.
When the Sinhala chauvinist commentors trash the others the moderators remain silent and when one of the others decides to retaliate with trash (not more spiteful than that which was aimed at them) the moderators shut them down. Several of my friends who have tried to have intelligent discussions on a TLA forum have quit out of exasperation because the moderators have made it very clear as to their stand on things.
I do not know if this is the policy of TLA. Perhaps the people who are moderating their forum have started to push their individual political agendas without the knowledge of the TLA people, but that is highly unlikely. Even when people have complained to the TLA admin, they have been asked to respect the rules set down by the moderator and shut up.
But increasingly they have also begun to openly express their right wing pro-war stance through reports in news, such as the one I reproduce below.
LTTE begins aggressive fund raising in Europe. Demands large
Special Correspondent in London, Mon Oct 31 14:58:58 EST 2005
During the last few weeks, LTTE operatives in major European cities have commenced an aggressive fund raising campaign demanding large sums of money from the Tamil expatriate community. In London, LTTE operatives are reported to be demanding 5000 pounds from individuals and 50 thousand pounds from businessmen. Despite the fact that the LTTE is a banned terrorist group and contributing or collecting money for the group is a punishable offense in the UK LTTE operatives are openly visiting business premises and demanding large sums from the shop owners. The operatives visiting Tamil residents at their homes are reported to be saying that 'After the elections, we are going for the war. This is the final and decisive attack to get our homeland. We need large sums of money urgently. We will return the money with interest in 3 years".
This article has the potential to be a huge story and TLA knows that. But there is no reporter credited with the story, and the details are very very vague. Special Correspondent in London? My ass. TLA doesn't have paid reporters anywhere. One of their friends probably called them up and told them this story.
I do not deny that this story is probably true. I have heard stories from people in Australia and Canada about the LTTE engaging in similar activities over there after the election. But the reason TLA put this story out is not because it wants to tell the truth, but because it wants to further it's own agenda (or the agenda of those who run it). They've become just another one of those groups who are always looking out for a big stick with which to beat the LTTE.
It's sad that these people call themselves academics, do little but steal news stories from other sources and republish them. They do no reporting of their own, and only publish rumors they have heard when it suits their need or is in keeping with their agenda.
But then, Sri Lankans are used to people like this calling themselves 'academics'.
Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/GK23Df01.html Ashanthi needs to read this. Not just browse through, but really study it to get some background knowledge. |
There are other plenty of sites too which are very similar to what you described in your blog. Some of the prominant ones are a) Asian Tribune b) Lanka Truth c) Nitharsanam It is really sad indeed. |
What morq do here is called acting. He has a career which indirectly benefits from being ruthlessly anti-sinhala-buddhist. But to keep a veil of 'neutrality' it's necessary to bash everyone else once in a while. This whole blog, as a lot of other blogs, is not something real. This is something like SMS presidency of Ranil (yeah, now I'm a Mahinda fan JVP troll alright eh, intellectuals?), a feel-good thingy, to satisfy a few people's personal needs - in different levels of need hierarchy. For Morq, it's a image boost. it's a part of Sanjaya Senanayke as a concept. For sittingnut, it's a way to release his frustration. See how he went all anti-ltte overnight. (It's interesting these balanced people who talk about ripping off a large number of votes being prevented in Jaffna forget the fact that this number itself was wrong to begin with, and that's why LTTE and Tamil mps don't allow census. :-)) As for ashanthi, she's a meta worm - a worm who lives on other worms shit. Morq lives on the shit of SL society, and Ashanthi the peace-blogger-is-my-occupation is living on Morq! I do not have anything serious against ivap and Indrajith. Unlike you, no one in Lanka Academic owe their importance or presense to what they do there, because they are not vapourware like you. People at LacNet don't call others names, they don't try to dissect others with different opinions. They say what they say, don't pretend to be politically correct by allowing all, and go on their real life. You "allow" others to comment, but when someone really questions you, or does not belong, you label him as a troll and ignore him. And then you feel good for allowing various views, and call Lanka Academic names. You have a set of your own "others" here who argue against you and whose arguments you arbritarily choose to address. They are your complement - not opposition. This is a problem in western academic ethics to begin with (because you see LacNet as pseudo-academic i guess you must be thinking that there is a great ethical thing called real academics which you adhere to): According to western ethics, in order to be a gentleman it's enough to allow others views. It is not necessary to address critisism or accept that you are wrong. As Max Plank correctly said, "a new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it." Thus, Kasbawa is a troll and Morq is a gentleman, sittingnut is another gentleman who doesn't always agree with morq. This is a big part of Ranils falure too. Instead of addressing issues on CFA etc. whole UNP campaign was focused on taxonomy: labelling those people who don't submit to their version of truth. Even now, instead of analysing where they went wrong, they seem to live on two arguments: LTTE argument, nauseous now, and the argument that the people who didn't vote UNP are stupid, and Mahinda is a buffalo. Very funny kind of serious people you are. Before Blogger, there were a lot of important, correct, intellectuals like you, who were interviewed on weekly basis by Ravaya every time Chandrika farted. Idea was to analyze how the fart would affect Sri Lanka. (Of course, it would sure make Sarath N de Silva look very bad and threaten his position) Sure they thought they had a lot of infuence to serious politics in SL. (I don't know if they are still there, but i hear in news that Ravaya got almost closed, except thanks for Kumar but CJ is still alive and kicking) - but i'm sure VI is still thinking that he has a say in politics. Thanks to free websites, now the batton is in your hands. FREE One-click publishing. Enjoy while it lasts, dudes, and think you are the ones whom people listen to and that you can label anything at will :) |
There were no dragons in LotR last time I checked. For some people Tolkien=LotR I know. sleepy, will answer other stuff laters. If i feel like. |
ivap - I came across that article and was wondering the same thing. I hope not, but if it is, that is absolutely disgusting! |
one of the results of current bias in sl media is that we will never be able to find the truth about this unless one or more of the foreign wire services confirm this. |
To close the worm issue, when I say that there were no dragons in LotR, I was not meaning passing mentions. Anyway I let it go first because nobody gives a shit and second because I'm not as infallible as you not to admit that I indeed forgot Smaug's mention in LotR. To address issues in the order they were presented; Ashanthi, for FSM's sake read before you write. I DID NOT post as an anon. I manually chose a name that seperates me from other anons, and that name happened to be a parody due to /. and it seems that I should have known better. If you say I'm still an anon as long as I do not have a blogger profile, since when does having a blogger profile was mandatory for people to talk? As for indi/ivap - I said I do not have any love for those people - Just that I don't comment on them because I haven't seen enough to comment. I have neither seen nor talked to them and I don't undertake sockpuppet jobs. Only event I can recall having stumbled upon them was when I saw a few dozen of hits a website I manage got with indi.ca as referrer url. For Morq: As could be predicted, you resorted to hit strawmen. I already addressed TLA/deletion argument. If I post this in TLA and get deleted, it would be wise for me not to post there. And I leave it at that. But my very argument was that non-deletion is not the ultimate measure of balance and on philosopical grounds, you are not any better than TLA except on how you look. Read my first post; I hate repetition. As for XG, no I don't endorse them. I chose that link so that I can save typing. What you said about them are more or less already known, and afaik after the Dec 26 split there are no academics left there. And from the reasons given for split I felt that those who left were no less hypocritical than those remained. But, to come to the matter at hand, isn't it a big ugly strawman to bash X-Group hanging on a link, when my major argument ---that non-deletion does not make you essentially holier-than-thou --- has nothing to do with them? I hope you won't start criticising Wikipedia this time. I heard about the Sivaram insidence - ironically from XP website where they boasted about that. To close with your "if you posted this in TLA" argument, I never visit them frequently, and I never visit you frequently. I was just trying to get whatever little news I can gather about SL online. Although I found this TLA issue interesting, I don't post on your (narcissistic as almost all blogs, and stupid, imho) political rants because of the reason I mentioned -- I don't think they have any serious effect on physical society -- and when I linked to XG to give that very point, you , rather than addressing that issue, resorted to say how stupid XG is, a thing I agree, but never bothered about. AGAIN, you proved what I said about you -- that so-called intellectual/ political/ know-it-all bloggers are just following a script and that script entirly consists of laballing others than finding out what the fuck is wrong with ourselves. Continue talking how great Ranil is and how stupid those Anuradhapura gamaya's were to vote him out. Continue ranting about LTTE robbing votes, and now move in to that hand-cutting thing and have another round of bloggheria of condemnation. Whole SL will eventually prosper. In retrospect, it was stupid to get involved with you in the first place. You will never get even this post for what it is on principal grounds. You, ladies and gentlemen, are FUBAR. So much for arguing with you. |
ashanthi - I'm confused. Are you making a statement, asking a question, telling me off or just being sarcastic? |
observer - I look forward to continuing the discussion here as this where it originated. I doubt if anyone is going to jump on you as long as you don't resort to troll like [link] inflamatory comments. Will address you comments later |
<< Home